This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of utilise.

Yesterday, nosotros covered Tim Cook's claim that the iPad Pro could easily replace laptops, to the bespeak that most people wouldn't even demand a computer. Early reviews of the iPad Pro are in, and while they point to a very strong device, they don't entirely assert Cook's views.

First, allow'southward hit the high points. Everyone agrees that this is a very big, very sexy iPad. It's low-cal, it'south well-congenital, the screen is gorgeous, and it'due south fast. Ars Technica'due south benchmarks bear witness the iPad Pro outperforming the Core Chiliad-equipped arrangement in CPU benchmarks and blowing information technology abroad in graphics tests. Granted, the ability to cross-compare across operating organisation's is extremely express, considering nearly iOS applications don't have like shooting fish in a barrel parallels with desktop software. Geekbench is an excellent synthetic exam in some ways, only it's non clear how well it maps to the complicated question of cross-compages CPU comparisons.

iPad-Perf

Paradigm by Ars Technica

That operation comes courtesy of the A9X, which maintains a dual-core configuration but clocks the CPU an extra 300MHz faster. If the iPad Pro'due south CPU is fast, however, it's GPU is remarkable. Here, the primary competition is Intel'south integrated Iris and Iris Pro graphics, and the iPad Pro smashes both. It may or may not be matched by future Skylake hardware with onboard EDRAM, merely Intel would have to make serious improvements to friction match what Apple has delivered here.

Ars also reports that the iPad Pro doesn't actually throttle at all, even after 30 minutes of solid testing. That'due south in contrast to the iPhone 6S, which does engage in throttling, though less and so than some previous devices. The Verge echoes that performance on the device is excellent, confirms it as a remarkable iPad (if a large one).

The growing pains

Neither site, however, confirms the iPad Pro every bit the must-have device that Tim Melt painted information technology every bit when he claimed it could supplant computers for virtually people. Even ignoring the classism embedded in the remark (the iPad Pro starts at nearly $thou with the $169 keyboard; Chromebooks and low-cost Windows systems can be had for $150 – $250), the fact is, the iPad Pro isn't ready to have over this role. Some of this is caused by the limitations of iOS ix — many of which appear to repeat criticism of Windows 8's sick-fated Metro interface. Capabilities similar app pinning and split-screen view don't ever work properly. Some applications automatically adjust themselves to this new divide interface, others don't.

The Verge notes that apps on iOS don't feel equally jarring as the application splitting that Microsoft used in Windows 8, since that effort ofttimes involved blending 2 completely different UI schemes, but attempting to multi-task on the OS nonetheless sheds harsh light on many of the platform'due south limitations. There's no trackpad, no interfacing with more 2 applications at a time, and no options to change how the secondary app switcher displays the list of switchable applications or the option to change how these applications are presented.

Veteran tech announcer Walt Mossberg loved the overall build quality on the tablet, but criticized the keyboard's high price ($169), and its lack of a trackpad, backlight, or dedicated iPad shortcut keys. Multiple reviewers have noted that the Logitech Create keyboard for the iPad Pro includes these features — and costs $19 less.

Right at present, everyone'south recommendations are qualified. Mossberg praises the Apple tree Pencil and its graphical applications, just finishes by saying "The iPad Pro will no doubt make a lot of Apple users happy, especially if they use it for graphics. But I won't be buying 1, and I don't recommend that boilerplate users practise and so either." The Verge states that the iPad is an awesome device that makes fewer sacrifices than expected, but that it "is yet not quite the computing savior that Steve Jobs predicted it would be v years ago." Ars Technica writes that the best way to think about the iPad Pro is as a starting point, with limitations that may make it a poor fit for many electric current users, but that most of the problems are in software, not hardware, and could exist relatively hands stock-still in future versions of iOS.

Speaking strictly for myself, based on the review coverage I've read, I'yard not sold on the device. While I personally own an iPhone, my tablets both run Android and my PCs are Windows based. As a person with a foot in all 3 camps (don't endeavor to visualize that), I still rely on Windows for serious work and overall utility. Patently this isn't going to exist truthful for everyone, and I'll be the first to say that the A9X'due south SoC performance is damned impressive, only I like the look of a device like the Surface Book more than than either the Surface Pro iv or the iPad Pro.

Nevertheless, that's a selection I'chiliad making based on software, not hardware. If Apple keeps iterating on the iPad Pro, that could change downwards the line.